| >> |
01/28/12(Sat)23:44 No.33741017
File1327812260.png-(504 KB, 1010x920, 1323155080679.png)
 >>33740427
>>33740453
Going full autism here
It's more plausable if only for the fact that it's a far less defined statement - I'm not talking about any "god" in a mythological sense, some omniscient bearded sky man obsessed with morality, that's obviously just as ridiculous as the tiger example - BUT to say "a non-defined unknown extra-universal intelligent entity or set of entities created the Universe through unknown means" (which by our understanding, they would be considered a sort of deity) is far more plausible than "There's a tiger shooting laser beams out of its eyes from the centre of a black hole".
The obvious reasons
A) Tigers can't breath in space, they can't survive the exposure, how is it doing this?
B) Even if it could, it would be crushed by the gravitational forces within the black hole long before being able to reach the "centre"
C) Tigers can't emit lasers from their eyes
D) Ignoring all of this, how did a tiger leave the Earth and survive a trip to the nearest black hole? At what point was this tiger sent to the black hole? How did it get there so fast?
E) If it isn't from Earth, what evolutionary path/environment lead to something identical to a tiger in every way, save for being able to survive a vacuum and tremendous gravitational forces, as well as somehow propel itself through space and have the ability to shoot lasers from it's eyes.
Again, I'm not saying there is a "god" nor that by there isn't some incredibly infinitesimal tiny tiny tiny chance that there is a tiger shooting eye beams out of a black hole, just that the comparison is rather ridiculous. |
