>> |
!!cJ4MGVqvOKw 10/20/11(Thu)05:56 No.30728299>>30728263 You mean like a "Behind The Ponies" concept? It'd be pretty interesting, certainly, but I don't know if anyone's tried their hand at it. I'd love to do it, though, if I could find the time!
>>30728271 It may well be accepted anywhere, but that doesn't make it a good pun. It's still god-awful, haha! I was thinking along those lines, but that's not really "chaotic" to me - there's a systematic change going on there, and any mechanism that follows certain processes to the letter and behaves in a routine, mechanical manner isn't really chaotic, just acting outside of normal expectations. That's why I was thinking it would have to be crazy, unpredictable - if not, it's not really discordant. It may well defy expectations and be weird, but there's a definite element of stability and predictability there, and that seems to defeat the purpose of being discordant to me. It's too bad that it's too early to discuss! I know the feeling. Ah, well, no worries. |