| >> |
!!cJ4MGVqvOKw 10/15/11(Sat)17:23 No.30598124>>30597851
Sorry, sorry! I can be a bit garrulous, I know. It's a problem. Nonetheless it's a useful word, I wholeheartedly recommend it if you ever want to make a literary analysis of any form. It really helps separate the boundaries of the narrative itself from the outside factors that influence it - in this case, we can apply it to the show by saying that intradiegetically Twilight made those faces because she was crazy as all fuck, and extradiegetically the influence of the EI restrictions being removed and, some might argue, the pandering to fandom interest led to a new, more expressive, traditionalist style on the show's part. Thinking about it, it's very John K., isn't it? I was never one for Ren and Stimpy, but even I can see the beginnings of a resemblance. On the actual topic of your post, yeah, I feel the same way. It's one of the great things to track in relation to voice actors who are in the industry for a long time - say, the progression of Leonard Nimoy's voice from the start of his career to where he is today, or in a more relevant example, John De Lancie, whose talents have certainly come a long way from his starting points. It's wonderful to watch, or in this case, hear, people round out and define themselves through their voices - and it's a really interesting sociological experiment too.
Wow, that was long. Anyway, I'll probably be fine with it if they do it in a way that's show relevant. If not, I'll just be disappointed. I might be markedly more saddened if Scootaloo's voice changes too much. |
