>> |
!!cJ4MGVqvOKw 10/03/11(Mon)14:50 No.30237616>>30237389 i think it's mostly the choice of colouring. there are lots of ponies with similar designs, sure, but those colours are eye-grabbing and seldom seen - that's why she has such a distinctive name and identification among her admittedly few fans. the way i see it, there are sillier foundations for defining a character - why not latch on to the most outlandish things for the occasional fanon? no one else has to agree with it or even like it, you know? i'm not denying that fanon should be more creative, or that she can't be a reckless renegade lawpony with a taste for the Equestrian underbelly. simply that it's perfectly okay for her also to make timepieces, work as an accountant in a gigantic corporation, or advertise toothpaste. even dentistry is okay. people are entitled to their interpretations, you know? the question i asked was meant to get people discussing said interpretations, as we are now. whether it's right or wrong is ultimately an immeasurably stupid concept, because fanon can't be right or wrong. it's not fact. we're just sharing opinions, really. |