>> |
!!cJ4MGVqvOKw 09/02/11(Fri)17:17 No.29304443>>29304074 Oh, alright! Haha, I'm glad you said that, for a moment there I was about to apologise again. I get a lot of flak for this wherever I go, it's hard not to be apologetic, you know? I'll try to cut it from now on!
>>29304092 I can see what you mean. If you just want a place to get your ideas out on paper (or in this case, data, I guess), then FP is the best place to do it for proper literary critique. It's devoted to literature, so it's certainly better in that regard - writers always seemed to get the short end of the stick at dA.
Truth be told, I've got it tracked, but I still haven't gotten around to reading it, so I'm sorry for that! I'll probably have time to sit down with it soon. I get what you mean, though. A lot of writers end up doing that, and at least you're just testing the water and gauging reactions with it, rather than taking it overly seriously or giving in. That's the way the world works, man! You appeal to a certain demographic, you keep that demographic. You change, they go, but you'll often find new ones as long as the foundations (in this case, technical stuff) are still present and accounted for at the same level of quality.
I agree, writing is crazy, haha! |