| >> |
05/25/11(Wed)07:59 No.26241368>>26241254
Oh, you want validation...? Allow me.
The first point in which you decided to 'take a shot' at me, was this:
"that was a weak response"
Which was in response to my post, which consisted of "Lesbians ARE gay." which is correct. Lesbians are in fact homosexual.
I then proceeded to, in a subtle fashion, call you a failure.
You then told me that I had a weak response. Ironically, you brought up no validation for this argument either, so I figured you were just stupid. An agreeable assumption, based on our previous interaction.
I then make another post in which I explain to you why I used simple terms in my previous post (I.E. "Lesbians Are Gay") to illustrate my point. I called you stupid a second time, as you seem to keep reinforcing that image with each subsequent response. This time, it's because you stated that I didn't know how to argue. This is also a fabrication, seeing as how I could have easily argued with you if we had actually been having an argument. Which we weren't. I was calling you stupid and you were making asinine comments in an attempt to justify your basic lack of reasoning ability.
My third response in no way resembled the 'no u' rebuttal, and in fact you bringing it up means that the entire post went right over your head. You then went on to say I was trying to hard. Which I find kind of interesting, seeing as how I'm not really even trying. If you consider this level of thought to require effort, it would seem my repeated statements revolving around your stupidity are getting more and more accurate as the conversation continues.
Would you like to try for round 4? |
