>> |
03/07/11(Mon)10:45 No.24092639>>24092559 I was waiting for the counter-argument, any counter argument, but it never came.
Don't misunderstand: there aren't any 100% correct methods, but you CAN identify someone if enough circumstantial evidence is available. If someone frequently misspells the same word in the same way, you might have a identified anon.
Picture names can also help; if someone previously used a certain name for a picture and that same name is used as anon, you might recognize it. Although if you just have numbers it takes someone really dedicated to track you down.
Now you can't PROVE the person is anon,. After all, there is a quite distinct possibility anyone could intentional mimic someone else. So if you worried about being "found out" it is unlikely. Far more likely you'll just forget to take off your trip or something and be found out that way. |