>> |
02/28/11(Mon)15:58 No.23894804>>23894553
I'm sort of the opposite. The Rule 34 of ponies doesn't bother me because I just think of it as being porn for yet another show I like. The fact that its furry doesn't even enter into the equation for me, like when I'm looking at Renamon porn, or a pic of a WoW hunter getting fucked by her Pet. I guess its technically furry, but I don't think of it that way.
Compare that to, say, Jay Naylors crap, which is all about anthropormorphic minks and skunks and wolves and shit fucking the bejeezus out of each other. Thats furry as hell, so furry that I can't even fap to it even though the art is fairly good.
Furry is a "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it" kind of thing. When stuff is truly furry and not just porn with cartoon animals, its painfully obvious to me. There's a difference that I feel is impossible to ignore. But a good general rule is that if its porn of an real, existing show, its just Rule 34, and not really furry. |