>> |
!tedl177Zx2 02/03/11(Thu)02:04 No.23150007>>23149707 I mostly say slaves as a reference to that ponies would likely not have a choice in the matter, though clearly being capable of choosing. It takes quite a lot of time, civilization, and prosperity for a nation to look into things like equal rights. And that's when the difference is merely skin deep.
As for what the ponies would do, due to intelligence, it's almost endless. A farmer could use a smaller pony to fetch sacks of grain, care for a child, care for other farm animals. In the city, they could run errands, deliver messages. The wealthy could afford them as pets, and children could ride them. Possibilities could go on and on. But I definitely see them as having no rights past being owned. |